The Catalyst Code Blog takes our two-sided platform concepts to heart by bringing together contributors and readers to deliver thought-provoking fodder in the payments, web 2.0, loyalty, advertising, mobile and social networking spaces. We hope you’ll join the conversation.


To learn more, visit MarketPlatforms.com


 

 




Subscribe (RSS-feed)

Or subscribe via email:

  •  

    Contributors

  •  

    Related Publications

  • Archive for November, 2007

    Will Kindle Ignite a Catalytic Reaction?

    By: David Evans on November 19th, 2007

    Jeff Bezos is supposed to unveil the Kindle today–a WiFi-connected e-book that will supposedly download your daily WSJ and NYTimes, make blogs and other content available for a free, make it easy to download books, including the NYTimes bestseller list, onto the device, along with other cool things. Others are working on similar devices. 
    As Karen Webster […]

    Comments

    The Gadget Age

    By: David Evans on November 12th, 2007

    “It’s the age of the media gadget” according to Michael Wolff’s provocative article in the December issue of Vanity Fair. His thesis is that specialized gadgets–from the iPhone to Google’s maps–are challenging the networks and the purveyors of “convergence” such as the XBox. Moreover, the popularity of gadgets that facilitate piracy and the […]

    Comments

    Google Mobile’s Strategy

    By: David Evans on November 6th, 2007

    Google’s ambitious mobile strategy is further evidence of the power of the advertising-revenue driven business model. The search-engine giant can entice handset makers with free software and operators with a cut of the advertising revenue stream. That cuts through a lot of the fights in the mobile business about who gets what share of […]

    Comments

    Gapper on Google

    By: David Evans on November 2nd, 2007

    John Gapper has an interesting oped in the Thursday’s Financial Times, “Mighty Google rings the changes,” that argues the two “catalysts for change” in mobile are Apple’s iPhone and the “impatience of regulators with the network operators.” What do you think?

    Comments