<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel</title>
	<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/</link>
	<description>The Catalyst Code</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: vergleich versicherung</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-21147</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-21147</guid>
					<description>I bought my apple shares 5 years ago and as you know it was a big success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my apple shares 5 years ago and as you know it was a big success.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: IN BUSINESS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Capitalists</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-4632</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-4632</guid>
					<description>[...] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carnival of the Capitalists &#124; My Personal Home Business</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-700</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-700</guid>
					<description>[...] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: My Personal Home Business &#187; Carnival of the Capitalists</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-699</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-699</guid>
					<description>[...] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Apple&#8217;s Achilles Heel [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bizosphere - Home of Carnival of the Capitalists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Capitalists for January 29, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-121</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-121</guid>
					<description>[...] tiger by declaring Steve Jobs&#8217;s current digital media strategy an eventual failure in &#8220;Apple’s Achilles Heel.&#8221; You can&#8217;t accuse Evans of picking on the little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tiger by declaring Steve Jobs&rsquo;s current digital media strategy an eventual failure in &ldquo;Apple’s Achilles Heel.&rdquo; You can&rsquo;t accuse Evans of picking on the little [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: M-RES</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-119</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-119</guid>
					<description>Interesting take on things David. Was worth the deviation from Forbes (where I found your comment). I think you're in the right ballpark about Apple's business partners jumping ship, but I also think you've misunderstood why they're doing it.

Apple has been forcing it's partners to accept lower prices in favour of a flat-rate fee to the customer for a long time and for once the consumer is benefitting through a fair price for media (at least for music anyway) compared to the over-inflated CD album prices to date (especially compared to vinyl and the associated production costs). In reality though we're still paying over the odds for what amounts to NO physical product, but this is less perceived than the difference between a 12" album with a big cardboard sleeve and a tiny cheap plastic disc in a plastic case (CD).

I'm not sure how the video sales will pan out for Apple, although there's no barrier stopping consumers choosing their download site(s) and then shifting those downloaded movies to their Apple-oriented digital media hub. It's at most a simple format conversion and there are already plenty of freeware solutions available to do this quickly.

AppleTV (as it stands currently) is an easy to use device, but also big with the modders (many have jumped over from XBox Media Centre modding) being as it is just a stripped down Mac. I should imagine Apple will be watching the mod scene closely to see what's most popular and may well integrate some of those ideas in future software updates (they've started to do this with the iPhone already). It's a clever strategy that cuts down on development costs - you only need to add the apps that people are really using and can forget adding hundreds of never-used utils.

If you're in the market for an Apple-based PVR, you could do much worse than considering the Mini as a media hub (I've just gone this route as my TV's still a CRT until it dies and I replace with LCD - so the DVI out is better for me than just HDMI/Component). It has built-in digital video/audio output (just need a DVI-HDMI converter lead and an optical audio lead), but additional features such as multiple USB ports (additional storage, mouse/kbd etc) and it has the must haves such as the remote for Front Row. I've invested in a USB Elgato digital tuner and EyeTV software (ties in to Front Row/Media Central etc) for my PVR needs and the online programme guides are great for setting up recording whole series in advance. You can also use Applescripts attached to your recordings folder to perform actions such as 'delete after X days' or get more advanced and include options to move certain programmes to folders on another drive on the network - great little hub, AND it's a full-blown Mac so you can always go surfing if you're bored, or play a game (if it's not too gfx heavy... it is only a mini!).

I think Don's comment about 'Ease of Use' is an pertinent factor. Apple are shifting their brand away from just 'computer company' to be a mainstream home appliance manufacturer. This may explain their focus on this ease of use - after all, you don't generally need much experience to use a washing machine or a stereo! ;)

Perhaps this spreading of their customer base is less of an achilles heel and more a case of 'fingers in as many pies as possible'. If one business area fails, the company is less likely to fail as a whole.

To have been through some of the rough times they have and yet come back fighting so hard that they have a share value at todays prices would suggest they're market-savvy enough to be looking very long term at the strategies and planning for multiple eventualities.

Interesting piece though.

PS: There's also the 'fan' factor to include with Apple (just as there was... er... still IS with Commodore - see the underground C64 and Amiga scenes still going all these years later). Even if a product fails and they hit a slump in sales, there's a very loyal userbase in place who will continue to buy the products. They've been lucky to have such an established niche in the high-end media markets for design/advertising/film/music etc. This is almost a guaranteed money-maker for them even if the consumer divisions wane. No matter what the mass consumer market does, those of us in the Creative sectors will continue to buy Macs because they're still the best and most stable machines for what we do (in such a hectic deadline oriented sector where you can't afford downtime) and as such work out with a cheaper TOC than the average PC. I administer all the Macs/PCs in our studio and I have to say that even though the Macs outnumber the WinPCs 10:1, the 3 or 4 Win PCs around the office have had more downtime in the past couple of years than all of the Macs combined (past and present) have had over the past 15 years... without exaggeration. This to me is a huge selling point when it comes to buying a computer - how much time will I spend fixing it and how much time being productive? So I for one will continue buying their products whilst their products continue to get the job done more efficiently (and until there's viable Linux alternatives for some of my applications, which is where I'll start saving MORE money) - it's simple economics for my scenario.

Anyway... I've gone on for far too long, Peace! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on things David. Was worth the deviation from Forbes (where I found your comment). I think you&#8217;re in the right ballpark about Apple&#8217;s business partners jumping ship, but I also think you&#8217;ve misunderstood why they&#8217;re doing it.</p>
<p>Apple has been forcing it&#8217;s partners to accept lower prices in favour of a flat-rate fee to the customer for a long time and for once the consumer is benefitting through a fair price for media (at least for music anyway) compared to the over-inflated CD album prices to date (especially compared to vinyl and the associated production costs). In reality though we&#8217;re still paying over the odds for what amounts to NO physical product, but this is less perceived than the difference between a 12&#8243; album with a big cardboard sleeve and a tiny cheap plastic disc in a plastic case (CD).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the video sales will pan out for Apple, although there&#8217;s no barrier stopping consumers choosing their download site(s) and then shifting those downloaded movies to their Apple-oriented digital media hub. It&#8217;s at most a simple format conversion and there are already plenty of freeware solutions available to do this quickly.</p>
<p>AppleTV (as it stands currently) is an easy to use device, but also big with the modders (many have jumped over from XBox Media Centre modding) being as it is just a stripped down Mac. I should imagine Apple will be watching the mod scene closely to see what&#8217;s most popular and may well integrate some of those ideas in future software updates (they&#8217;ve started to do this with the iPhone already). It&#8217;s a clever strategy that cuts down on development costs - you only need to add the apps that people are really using and can forget adding hundreds of never-used utils.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re in the market for an Apple-based PVR, you could do much worse than considering the Mini as a media hub (I&#8217;ve just gone this route as my TV&#8217;s still a CRT until it dies and I replace with LCD - so the DVI out is better for me than just HDMI/Component). It has built-in digital video/audio output (just need a DVI-HDMI converter lead and an optical audio lead), but additional features such as multiple USB ports (additional storage, mouse/kbd etc) and it has the must haves such as the remote for Front Row. I&#8217;ve invested in a USB Elgato digital tuner and EyeTV software (ties in to Front Row/Media Central etc) for my PVR needs and the online programme guides are great for setting up recording whole series in advance. You can also use Applescripts attached to your recordings folder to perform actions such as &#8216;delete after X days&#8217; or get more advanced and include options to move certain programmes to folders on another drive on the network - great little hub, AND it&#8217;s a full-blown Mac so you can always go surfing if you&#8217;re bored, or play a game (if it&#8217;s not too gfx heavy&#8230; it is only a mini!).</p>
<p>I think Don&#8217;s comment about &#8216;Ease of Use&#8217; is an pertinent factor. Apple are shifting their brand away from just &#8216;computer company&#8217; to be a mainstream home appliance manufacturer. This may explain their focus on this ease of use - after all, you don&#8217;t generally need much experience to use a washing machine or a stereo! <img src='http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Perhaps this spreading of their customer base is less of an achilles heel and more a case of &#8216;fingers in as many pies as possible&#8217;. If one business area fails, the company is less likely to fail as a whole.</p>
<p>To have been through some of the rough times they have and yet come back fighting so hard that they have a share value at todays prices would suggest they&#8217;re market-savvy enough to be looking very long term at the strategies and planning for multiple eventualities.</p>
<p>Interesting piece though.</p>
<p>PS: There&#8217;s also the &#8216;fan&#8217; factor to include with Apple (just as there was&#8230; er&#8230; still IS with Commodore - see the underground C64 and Amiga scenes still going all these years later). Even if a product fails and they hit a slump in sales, there&#8217;s a very loyal userbase in place who will continue to buy the products. They&#8217;ve been lucky to have such an established niche in the high-end media markets for design/advertising/film/music etc. This is almost a guaranteed money-maker for them even if the consumer divisions wane. No matter what the mass consumer market does, those of us in the Creative sectors will continue to buy Macs because they&#8217;re still the best and most stable machines for what we do (in such a hectic deadline oriented sector where you can&#8217;t afford downtime) and as such work out with a cheaper TOC than the average PC. I administer all the Macs/PCs in our studio and I have to say that even though the Macs outnumber the WinPCs 10:1, the 3 or 4 Win PCs around the office have had more downtime in the past couple of years than all of the Macs combined (past and present) have had over the past 15 years&#8230; without exaggeration. This to me is a huge selling point when it comes to buying a computer - how much time will I spend fixing it and how much time being productive? So I for one will continue buying their products whilst their products continue to get the job done more efficiently (and until there&#8217;s viable Linux alternatives for some of my applications, which is where I&#8217;ll start saving MORE money) - it&#8217;s simple economics for my scenario.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; I&#8217;ve gone on for far too long, Peace! <img src='http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-118</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-118</guid>
					<description>I just realised where you got your image of people ripping out their flat panel TVs for the sake of an AppleTV.
There was a story on Appleinsider of a Goldman Sachs report speculating that an update to the Apple TV "could include an LCD display". That's to say, a display on the unit akin to the display on a DVD player. Not a TV set. nobody's gonna rip out their TV sets for that.
Although if Apple's strategy pays off in the long run, I could see Apple making deals with manufacturers like LG or Phillips and others to incorporate AppleTV into some models, which would be really cool. Microsoft or Amazon would have to make similar deals to stay competitive. Only MS already has the OS and software, but currently lack the hardware, which shouldn't be too difficult. Shares in the abovementioned Vudu would plummet, as I don't see them having the clout to make similar deals. Apple is a global company with iTunes stores around the world, including Asia, whereas the former is US only.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realised where you got your image of people ripping out their flat panel TVs for the sake of an AppleTV.<br />
There was a story on Appleinsider of a Goldman Sachs report speculating that an update to the Apple TV &#8220;could include an LCD display&#8221;. That&#8217;s to say, a display on the unit akin to the display on a DVD player. Not a TV set. nobody&#8217;s gonna rip out their TV sets for that.<br />
Although if Apple&#8217;s strategy pays off in the long run, I could see Apple making deals with manufacturers like LG or Phillips and others to incorporate AppleTV into some models, which would be really cool. Microsoft or Amazon would have to make similar deals to stay competitive. Only MS already has the OS and software, but currently lack the hardware, which shouldn&#8217;t be too difficult. Shares in the abovementioned Vudu would plummet, as I don&#8217;t see them having the clout to make similar deals. Apple is a global company with iTunes stores around the world, including Asia, whereas the former is US only.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-117</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-117</guid>
					<description>I just looked up what the VuDu is and some reviews. An interesting box. And a lot like the AppleTV take two. It seems if you're someone who's in the market for a Vudu, you'd be equally in the market for an AppleTV. The movie rental prices and conditions are identical, dictated by the studios as they are. They both have a limited initial selection, probably the same catalog, and you can buy from both. A difference is you can back up purchased content on an AppleTV, it seems you can't on Vudu.
Vudu has a very slick interface and featureset, which may be a clincher for some, the use of P2P is interesting even if it doesn't affect the user, except that he's uploading as well as downloading. It does require a cable modem, however, going by the reviews, regular DSL it seems isn't good enough. Not a limitation of the Apple TV unless you want it instantly. And the Vudu is much larger and costs much more. Plus the AppleTV has a few more features besides movies, such as TV shows, music, pictures, podcasts and Youtube.
It seems they both have their pluses and minuses, but I don't get why you don't get Apple's movie rental strategy without them going into the TV business (Vudu isn't either), or see that the difference between their service and other online ones are instant gratification via the internet straight to you PC or AppleTV, much like the Vudu. Current-generation Multimedia PCs and XBoxes are not in the running.

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/top/vudu-video-wonderbox-picture-walkthrough-and-review-just-short-of-wonderful-297309.php
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/technology/circuits/06pogue.html?_r=2&#38;oref=slogin&#38;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked up what the VuDu is and some reviews. An interesting box. And a lot like the AppleTV take two. It seems if you&#8217;re someone who&#8217;s in the market for a Vudu, you&#8217;d be equally in the market for an AppleTV. The movie rental prices and conditions are identical, dictated by the studios as they are. They both have a limited initial selection, probably the same catalog, and you can buy from both. A difference is you can back up purchased content on an AppleTV, it seems you can&#8217;t on Vudu.<br />
Vudu has a very slick interface and featureset, which may be a clincher for some, the use of P2P is interesting even if it doesn&#8217;t affect the user, except that he&#8217;s uploading as well as downloading. It does require a cable modem, however, going by the reviews, regular DSL it seems isn&#8217;t good enough. Not a limitation of the Apple TV unless you want it instantly. And the Vudu is much larger and costs much more. Plus the AppleTV has a few more features besides movies, such as TV shows, music, pictures, podcasts and Youtube.<br />
It seems they both have their pluses and minuses, but I don&#8217;t get why you don&#8217;t get Apple&#8217;s movie rental strategy without them going into the TV business (Vudu isn&#8217;t either), or see that the difference between their service and other online ones are instant gratification via the internet straight to you PC or AppleTV, much like the Vudu. Current-generation Multimedia PCs and XBoxes are not in the running.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/top/vudu-video-wonderbox-picture-walkthrough-and-review-just-short-of-wonderful-297309.php" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/top/vudu-video-wonderbox-picture-walkthrough-and-review-just-short-of-wonderful-297309.php</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/technology/circuits/06pogue.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/technology/circuits/06pogue.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-116</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-116</guid>
					<description>Somehow the image of Apple stores being as prolific as McDonald's is a little disturbing, not just because they are oversaturated, but because of the cheap junkfood mentality they represent. PC stores are more like McDonald's in that respect, though they are not of a united brand or image, but make a living selling cheap junk. I am joking in the latter, as there are quality PCs too, even Dell is getting better and starting to put some design into their products, though a bit too eager to copy the iMac design.
As for the comment of an Apple-branded TV, at first this might seem ludicrous, but considering how Apple admires Sony, well who knows, we might consider Apple consumer goods as natural as we do Sony, which is also a premium brand with an emphasis on great design.
But I don't see that as probable in the near term.
The AppleTV, however, could be a much bigger deal than you think. It could be the start of a business model which has eluded Microsoft so far, convincing people to put a PC in the living room as an entertainment hub. There are numerous Multimedia PCs, even the XBox, but they are still big noisy boxes that don't fit in the living room. A small, quiet, sleek box like the AppleTV, perhaps with a Blu-Ray player, is what people will want. The Blu-Ray and HD-DVD war is still being waged tough and not many titles exist, with the hardware being too pricey, but I can see a bigger brother to the existing AppleTV having one. That and being able to act as a PVR.
The AppleTV v2 in combination with the movie store may just be the catalyst to start this new platform off, where v1 was promising but lacking somewhat, with the need to sync with a regular Pc and having no downloadable movies. Whether the terms dictated by the studios will excite I don't know, many have commented on the issue of only having 24hrs to finish after the movie is started. I also think rentals, especially HD, must be cheaper. If they can build up a big back catalog of old classic movies, which the physical stores typically don't stock, it will be very tempting to someone like me.

It is early days, but I think you underestimate the potential of the combination of AppleTV v2 (or future revisions) and the movie store along with new indie media like vidcasts and Youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow the image of Apple stores being as prolific as McDonald&#8217;s is a little disturbing, not just because they are oversaturated, but because of the cheap junkfood mentality they represent. PC stores are more like McDonald&#8217;s in that respect, though they are not of a united brand or image, but make a living selling cheap junk. I am joking in the latter, as there are quality PCs too, even Dell is getting better and starting to put some design into their products, though a bit too eager to copy the iMac design.<br />
As for the comment of an Apple-branded TV, at first this might seem ludicrous, but considering how Apple admires Sony, well who knows, we might consider Apple consumer goods as natural as we do Sony, which is also a premium brand with an emphasis on great design.<br />
But I don&#8217;t see that as probable in the near term.<br />
The AppleTV, however, could be a much bigger deal than you think. It could be the start of a business model which has eluded Microsoft so far, convincing people to put a PC in the living room as an entertainment hub. There are numerous Multimedia PCs, even the XBox, but they are still big noisy boxes that don&#8217;t fit in the living room. A small, quiet, sleek box like the AppleTV, perhaps with a Blu-Ray player, is what people will want. The Blu-Ray and HD-DVD war is still being waged tough and not many titles exist, with the hardware being too pricey, but I can see a bigger brother to the existing AppleTV having one. That and being able to act as a PVR.<br />
The AppleTV v2 in combination with the movie store may just be the catalyst to start this new platform off, where v1 was promising but lacking somewhat, with the need to sync with a regular Pc and having no downloadable movies. Whether the terms dictated by the studios will excite I don&#8217;t know, many have commented on the issue of only having 24hrs to finish after the movie is started. I also think rentals, especially HD, must be cheaper. If they can build up a big back catalog of old classic movies, which the physical stores typically don&#8217;t stock, it will be very tempting to someone like me.</p>
<p>It is early days, but I think you underestimate the potential of the combination of AppleTV v2 (or future revisions) and the movie store along with new indie media like vidcasts and Youtube.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-115</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2008/01/18/apples-achilles-heel/#comment-115</guid>
					<description>Ease of use, ease of use, ease of use.  Most people are not GEEKS!  They just want to turn it on and go!  This is what you are missing.  The masses want products like the iPhone that don't require a 250 page manual to use.  You are so deep into computers and technology for so many years that you cannot see what has changed.  It's the consumer!  The consumer wants a to USE the machine not figure it out, fix it, modify it, put batteries in it, hot rod it.   My grandparents are now using a Mac.  I'll tell you what, you come back and revisit this post you wrote in 10 years when there are Apple stores in every prime retail location just like Macdonalds is and then tell me Apple and Steve Jobs don't get what the consumer wants.  What the consumer wants is something that they are not afraid of.  Something that works.  This all reminds me of the American automobile industry 25 years ago.  Along comes Toyota and well the rest is history.  No offense but I think you are completely wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ease of use, ease of use, ease of use.  Most people are not GEEKS!  They just want to turn it on and go!  This is what you are missing.  The masses want products like the iPhone that don&#8217;t require a 250 page manual to use.  You are so deep into computers and technology for so many years that you cannot see what has changed.  It&#8217;s the consumer!  The consumer wants a to USE the machine not figure it out, fix it, modify it, put batteries in it, hot rod it.   My grandparents are now using a Mac.  I&#8217;ll tell you what, you come back and revisit this post you wrote in 10 years when there are Apple stores in every prime retail location just like Macdonalds is and then tell me Apple and Steve Jobs don&#8217;t get what the consumer wants.  What the consumer wants is something that they are not afraid of.  Something that works.  This all reminds me of the American automobile industry 25 years ago.  Along comes Toyota and well the rest is history.  No offense but I think you are completely wrong&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

