<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Gives a Tweet?</title>
	<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/</link>
	<description>The Catalyst Code</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13626</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13626</guid>
					<description>First, thanks, Michael for following me on Twitter! I will try to tweet often and with interesting updates!

One of the theories about social networks and those who produce content on social networks is that, in general, people tend to produce content for people they know more frequently than people they dont know. In fact, the Twitter study referenced in my blog had that as one of its hypotheses. It may be that women are more interested in producing content for people they know (e.g. friends/colleagues) than for people they dont know since women may actually use their content to engage with those friends/colleagues. Since Twitter is a medium for broadcasting and not exchange, that may be one plausible reason and why women are  much more active on Facebook. 

In any case, it is fascinating, don't you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, thanks, Michael for following me on Twitter! I will try to tweet often and with interesting updates!</p>
<p>One of the theories about social networks and those who produce content on social networks is that, in general, people tend to produce content for people they know more frequently than people they dont know. In fact, the Twitter study referenced in my blog had that as one of its hypotheses. It may be that women are more interested in producing content for people they know (e.g. friends/colleagues) than for people they dont know since women may actually use their content to engage with those friends/colleagues. Since Twitter is a medium for broadcasting and not exchange, that may be one plausible reason and why women are  much more active on Facebook. </p>
<p>In any case, it is fascinating, don&#8217;t you think?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Haupt</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13613</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13613</guid>
					<description>I had no idea the majority of the people I'm following are men, but you're 100% correct!  Will have to redress that immediately!

That said, on average (with those I am following only), men appear to tweet more frequently than women, by a factor of 4 or 5.  Any thoughts on why that might be?

I do agree that Twitter "fails as a true social media where the goal is to engage others in a two or multi-way conversation."  I can count on one hand the number of people who respond to questions and engage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea the majority of the people I&#8217;m following are men, but you&#8217;re 100% correct!  Will have to redress that immediately!</p>
<p>That said, on average (with those I am following only), men appear to tweet more frequently than women, by a factor of 4 or 5.  Any thoughts on why that might be?</p>
<p>I do agree that Twitter &#8220;fails as a true social media where the goal is to engage others in a two or multi-way conversation.&#8221;  I can count on one hand the number of people who respond to questions and engage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13271</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13271</guid>
					<description>We need more Dereks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need more Dereks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Derek Pilling</title>
		<link>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13270</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecatalystcode.com/theconversation/blog/2009/06/11/who-gives-a-tweet/#comment-13270</guid>
					<description>Karen, I'm trying to break the 10% rules; now following you (a woman) on Twitter. Promise to read all your tweets - or at least those I see when I happen to be looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen, I&#8217;m trying to break the 10% rules; now following you (a woman) on Twitter. Promise to read all your tweets - or at least those I see when I happen to be looking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

